Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the company's seriousness in preparing a sustainability report. The assessment of the indicators' suitability used the guidance of Global Reporting Initiatives and found that the company has tried to fulfill the GRI's Guidance.
Method: This study used a qualitative approach to explain sustainability report disclosure and GRI guidance. Thirty-eight companies have been selected from Asia Sustainability Reporting 2018; by using purposive random sampling. There were only three companies chosen as the research subject. Data was collected with document analysis, observation, and depth-interview.
Results: This study showed that the award obtained by companies becomes one of the additional motivations related to the level of disclosure suitability. It was related to the seriousness of preparing the sustainability report that the Government can use as environmental organizations and academics to boost the company to implement the social responsibility and environment that implements the activity. It was helpful for stakeholders to assess the company's environmental and social performance.
Conclusions: The seriousness of sustainability reporting corresponds with the level of sustainability reporting against GRI standards and the external auditors who review the reports. By implementing sustainability reporting, stakeholders can more holistically assess a company's performance.
Publisher
South Florida Publishing LLC
Subject
Law,Development,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Reference34 articles.
1. Aggarwal, P. (2013). Impact of Sustainability Performance of Company on its Financial Performance: A Study of Listed Indian Companies. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 13(11).
2. Antonini, C., Beck, C., & Larrinaga, C. (2020). Subpolitics and sustainability reporting boundaries. The case of working conditions in global supply chains. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(7), 1535–1567. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2019-4167
3. Bellucci, M., Simoni, L., Acuti, D., & Manetti, G. (2019). Stakeholder engagement and dialogic accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(5), 1467–1499. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2017-3158
4. Bepari, M. K., & Mollik, A. T. (2016). Stakeholders’ interest in sustainability assurance process. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(6/7), 655–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2015-1208
5. Biryukov, V., Nemtchinova, E., Pavlova, T., Kagosyan, A., & Avdeeva, T. (2023). Development of competence in the sphere of information security to achieve sustainable development. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(1), e0267. https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.267