Abstract
Objective: This research aims to investigate and analyze the assimilation models of ex-offenders of terrorism and identify the factors that drive them to participate willingly in the process of social reintegration.
Theoretical Framework: Using the segmented assimilation theory developed by Porter and Zou, this study examines the movement of former convicts through various institutions and social and economic activities has led to their acceptance by society or if they need to follow a different trajectory.
Method: A qualitative descriptive ap proach, coupled with the phenomenological method, was employed to gain profound insights into the lived experience of 15 former convicts hailing from diverse districts and cities in Central Java, Indonesia. To collect the data, we conduct interviews individually and in group to gain extensive their trajectory experiences for peace.
Results and Discussion: The results of the study indicate that two trajectory models occur in society as a way of returning former terrorists to a peaceful path: (a) the independent model and (b) the institutional model. The independent model focuses on individual roles and initiatives in the ex-offender communicating with the community through family, friends, or community leaders and religious paths to gain the trust of the intended social community.
Research Implications: This study provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of social reintegration for ex-offenders of terrorism, highlighting the importance of both individual initiatives and institutional support in facilitating successful assimilation into society.
Originality/Value: The study offers an original contribution to the field by examining the specific assimilation trajectories of ex-terrorists, providing a nuanced understanding of the social reintegration process and identifying key factors that influence successful reintegration.
Publisher
South Florida Publishing LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Adnan, M., & Amaliyah, A. (2021). Radicalism Vs Extremism: The Dilemma Of Islam And Politics In Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 20, 24–48. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.20.1.2021.24
2. Ambrozik, C. (2019). Why Terrorists Quit: The Disengagement of Indonesian Jihadists. Terrorism and Political Violence, 31(6), 1371–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1666577
3. Anindya, C. R. (2018). Reintegrating Former Terrorist Inmates: Role of Local Government. In RSIS Commentary. RSIS. www.rsis.edu.sg
4. Archetti, C. (2015). Terrorism, Communication and New Media: Explaining Radicalization in the Digital Age. https://about.jstor.org/terms
5. Asongu, S. A., Orim, S. M. I., & Nting, R. T. (2019). Terrorism and Social Media: Global Evidence. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 22(3), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1642023