Private Sector Bribery as a Corruption Crime for Legal Certainty in Indonesia

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this article is to examine the following considerations, the urgency of regulating corruption as a corruption crime (TIPIKOR) and the urgency of legal reform of the law for TIPIKOR in the future.   Method: This study paper uses legal study that uses legal standards, reviews using the techniques of analyzing legal documents through study, and is presented in descriptive text.   Results: As a result of the study, it was found that the reason for the weak anti-corruption law is the lack of visibility of Typico criminals committed outside the government. All artists who perform TIPIKOR must cooperate with national organizations, and even if the result of this action causes the country to lose a lot of money or the country's economy is down.   Conclusion: The regulation of private sector bribery as a TIPIKOR in Indonesia is urgently needed to provide legal certainty against corruption acts spread across various rules that do not regulate TIPIKOR. The form of legal uncertainty is reflected in the many regulations that are outside the TIPIKOR law that regulates corruption in the private sector as specified in UNCAC 2003 but are not seen as TIPIKOR, so these actions are not seen as extraordinary crimes as is the case with corruption.