Prosecutor's Office Intelligence Actions in Solving Corruption Crimes Through Types of Intelligence Difference

Abstract

Purpose: To examine and explain the ideal authority of the prosecutor's office in the field of law enforcement intelligence in resolving criminal acts of corruption.   Theoretical reference: three types of Intelligence-State Interaction that tend to occur. The three types of interaction are Political Intelligence, Intelligence Militarization, and Intelligence State.   Method: This type of research uses normative-empirical research, translated into legal research equipped with empirical data.   Result and Conclusion: That Prosecutor's Intelligence is a state intelligence provider with certain differentiation in the field of law enforcement and prevention of criminal acts of corruption in accordance with the principles of national interest and security. The prosecutor's office has intelligence functions, so the prosecutor's office must be able to become a center for intelligence data in resolving criminal acts of corruption, especially at the investigation and prosecution stages, through differentiation types, practically the prosecutor's intelligence actions in resolving criminal acts of corruption are through 5 (five) stages of activity namely planning and direction, collection, processing, analysis and production, dissemination).   Implications of research: To find the ideal prosecutor's authority in the field of law enforcement intelligence as a means of resolving criminal acts of corruption.   Originality/value: enforcement of law enforcement intelligence by prosecutors using an intelligence differentiation type approach.