VIÉS DE TEMPO, PESSOA E LUGAR: Ampliando o olhar através da Teoria dos Pressupostos da Qualidade Científica

Author:

Souza Filho Breno Augusto Bormann deORCID,Tritany Érika Fernandes,Struchiner Cláudio JoséORCID

Abstract

The literature presents several classifications for methodological biases, however little is discussed about the possible biases related to the theoretical foundation adopted in the research. Based on the Theory of Assumptions of Scientific Quality, we present reflections and conceptual expansions related to theoretical-methodological biases in research. A critical-reflective text supported by a narrative review, whose material collection process was carried out in a non-systematic way, chosen exclusively and based on the line of argument and reflection that the authors intend to submit to appreciation and public debate. Describe the importance of explaining the theoretical foundation and possible biases related to central aspects of life, namely, the time, person and place for public health research and its intersection with the process of elaboration, development and reporting in scientific studies. Classify and describe the biased types of time, person and place referring to the conceptual and empirical planes and the important elaboration and description of the combination of both for scientific work. It is hoped that this article will raise discussions and reflections on the current theoretical-methodological process that permeates scientific work and encourages the use and adequate explanation of the foundation and its possible theoretical biases.

Publisher

Psicologia e Saude em Debate

Reference15 articles.

1. Adom, D., Hussein, E. K., & Agyem, J. A. (2018). Theoretical and Conceptual Framework: Mandatory Ingredients of a Quality Research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 438–441. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/international-journal-of-scientific-research-(IJSR)/fileview.php?val=January_2018_1514812002__202.pdf

2. Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde. (2024). Pesquisa | Portal Regional da BVS. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/decs-locator/?lang=pt&mode=&tree_id=N05.715.350.150

3. Cabrera Arana, G. A. (2007). Uso de Teorías y Modelos en Artículos de una Revista Latinoamericana de Salud Pública, 2000-2004. Revista de Saúde Pública, 41(6), 963–969. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000600011

4. Cabrera Arana, G. A., Molina Marín, G., & Rodríguez Tejada, C. (2005). Base Teórica en una Muestra de Investigaciones de la Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública-Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia 1965-2004. Revista de Salud Pública, 7(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642005000100008

5. Coutinho, M. (1998). Princípios de epidemiologia clínica aplicada à cardiologia. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 71(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X1998000800003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3