Analysis of cyclical systemic risks in spain and of their mitigation through countercyclical bank capital requirements
Author:
Estrada Ángel1, Pérez Montes Carlos1, Abad Jorge1, Broto Carmen1, Cáceres Esther1, Ferrer Alejandro1, Abad Jorge1, Ganics Gergely1, García Villasur Javier1, Hurtado Samuel1, Lavín Nadia1, Marbet Joël1, Martorell Enric1, Martínez-Miera David2, Molina Ana1, Pablos Irene1, Pérez-Quirós Gabriel1
Affiliation:
1. BANCO DE ESPAÑA 2. UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID
Abstract
This paper first identifies the level of cyclical systemic risks in Spain, also calibrating their impact on the solvency of the banking system, and, second, assesses the costs and benefits of the countercyclical use of capital requirements. The first part of the paper is based on an integrated analysis of indicators and other quantitative and qualitative information, while impacts are calibrated using a combination of macroeconomic projection models and stress tests. The second part of the analysis is undertaken using quantile regression models, applied to European data, Bayesian time series models, applied to data for Spain, and a general equilibrium model. The integrated analysis to identify cyclical systemic risks shows the importance of a holistic approach monitoring the different dimensions of these risks, while the impact calibration shows that slight or intermediate materialisation of such risks also involves material capital consumption for the banking sector. The different methodologies applied for cost-benefit analysis find favourable results, in terms of GDP and credit growth, for the activation of releasable capital requirements in situations where cyclical systemic risks are intermediate and high and, notably, for their release in adverse cyclical phases.
Publisher
Banco de España
Reference56 articles.
1. Abbot, Jorge, David Martinez-Miera, and Javier Suarez. (2024). “Banks’ Endogenous Systemic Risk Taking.”WorkingPapers-BancodeEspaña,forthcoming. 2. Adrian, Tobias, Nina Boyarchenko and Domenico Giannone. (2019a). “Vulnerable Growth”. American EconomicReview, Vol. 109, pp. 1263-1289. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161923 3. Adrian,Tobias.,DongHe,NellieLiangandFabioNatalucci(2019b).“Amonitoringframeworkforglobalfinancialstability”. Staff Discussion Notes, No. 19/06, International Monetary Fund, pp. 1-31. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2019/08/23/A-Monitoring-Framework-for-Global-Financial-Stability-46645 4. Aikman,David,JonathanBridges,SinemHaciogluHoke,CianO’NeillandAkashRaja.(2019).“Credit,capitalandcrises: a GDP-at-risk approach”. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 15864. CEPR. https://cepr.org/publications/dp15864 5. Ampudia,Miguel,LoDuca,Marco,Farkas,Mátyás,Pérez-Quirós,Gabriel,Pirovano,Mara,Rünstler,GerhardandTereanu,Eugen.“Ontheeffectivenessofmacroprudentialpolicy”EuropeanCentralBankWorkingPaperNo2559 / May 2021. https://doi.org/10.2866/869839
|
|