Meeting national land use related objectives while safeguarding typical landscapes
-
Published:2023-12-31
Issue:23
Volume:23
Page:8-14
-
ISSN:2255-8640
-
Container-title:Landscape architecture and art
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:LAA
Author:
Valujeva Kristine1ORCID, Nipers Aleksejs2ORCID, Grinfelde Inga1ORCID, Liepa Sindija1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Scientific Laboratory of Forest and Water Resources, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvia 2. Institute of Economics and Regional Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvia
Abstract
Landscapes play a significant role in the regional development by providing ecosystem services to the local communities. Significant changes in land management due to the political decisions may significantly change the typical landscape in rural areas. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore how to use the landscape differences to facilitate achievement of national socio-economic and environmental objectives, while avoiding significant changes and safeguarding typical landscapes. Cluster analysis was used to identify relatively homogeneous groups with four socio-economic and environmental indicators, namely, profit, employment, net GHG emissions, habitat quality. Results show that clusters with the highest socio-economic return are located closest to the capital city and carbon sequestration measures may be concentrated in the landscapes that are geographically farthest from the capital city, but then the abandonment of rural areas and the disappearance of typical landscapes may occur. The political decisions related to land use change should be adapted to the specific landscape, so that not only socio-economic and environmental objectives are achieved together with the fulfilment of international obligations, but also the typical landscape of the specific landscape region is preserved.
Publisher
Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies
Reference21 articles.
1. Schirpke, U., Mölk, F., Feilhauer, E., Tappeiner, U., Tappeiner, G. How suitable are discrete choice experiments based on landscape indicators for estimating landscape preferences? Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, No. 237, p. 104813. 2. Guo, Y., Ren, Z., Dong, Y., Zhang, P., Wang, C., Ma, Z., He, X. Multifunctionality can be promoted by increasing agriculture-dominated heterogeneous landscapes in an agro-forestry interlacing zone in northeast China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, No. 238, p. 104832. 3. Valujeva, K., Debernardini, M., Freed, E. K., Nipers, A., Schulte, R. P. O. Abandoned farmland: Past failures or future opportunities for Europe’s Green Deal? A Baltic case-study. Environmental Science & Policy, 2022, No. 128, p. 175–184. 4. Ma, S., Wang, L. J., Jiang, J., Zhao, Y. G. Direct and indirect effects of agricultural expansion and landscape fragmentation processes on natural habitats. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2023, No. 353, p. 108555. 5. Pinillos, D., Bianchi, F. J. J. A., Poccard-Chapuis, R., Corbeels, M., Tittonell, P., & Schulte, R. P. O. Understanding Landscape Multifunctionality in a Post-forest Frontier : Supply and Demand of Ecosystem Services in Eastern Amazonia, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2020, No. 206, p. 1–16.
|
|