Abstract
The main objective of this research is to identify the current panorama of scientific production associated with governance in university institutions. A bibliometric analysis was developed in Scopus using R Core Team 2022-Bibliometrix and Vosviewer software. The results highlight the countries with the highest productivity in the topic of study, with the most representative authors favoring the understanding of governance. The main thematic clusters stand out. It recognizes the role of university governance and its migration to direct spaces and the transition from a face-to-face model.
Publisher
Eurasia Academic Publishing Group
Subject
General Arts and Humanities
Reference13 articles.
1. Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
2. Bleiklie, I. & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and Governance of Universities. Higher Education Policy, 20.
3. Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2005). Orchestrating creative minds. The governance of higher education and research in four countries compared. DANS is an institute of KNAW and NWO, 02-17.
4. Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher education, 62(4), 503-517.
5. Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher education, 62(5), 665-683.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献