Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surfactant replacement therapy is a recognized treatment for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in the newborns. Over the past 30 years, human and animal trials have been performed regarding administration of aerosolized surfactant to the injured lung, however the result has been unsatisfactory when compared with instilled surfactant delivery via endotracheal tube (ETT). This review aims to investigate the current issues, challenges and future recommendation of aerosolized surfactant therapy.CONTENT: Five randomized clinical trials in humans and 13 animal trials met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Most animal trials agree that this method of treatment is feasible. However, human trials presented conflicting results, and generally showed it to be ineffective. When compared with surfactant delivery via ETT, aerosolized surfactant is less effective in improving respiratory function.SUMMARY: The current data from human trials does not support the implementation of aerosolized surfactant therapy to treat newborns with RDS. Further research is necessary to improve nebulization, delivery, distribution and deposition in the lung, to investigate aerosolized surfactant delivery via ETT and to determine the appropriate dose.KEYWORDS: surfactant, aerosol, prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome
Publisher
Secretariat of The Indonesian Biomedical Journal
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference64 articles.
1. Current perspectives in pulmonary surfactant — Inhibition, enhancement and evaluation
2. West JB. Respiratory physiology: the essentials. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; 2005.
3. Defects in Surfactant Synthesis: Clinical Implications
4. Surfactant Replacement Therapy
5. Lissauer T, Fanaroff AA. Neonatology at a glance. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献