Supply and Demand System Approach to Development of Bridge Management Strategies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Supply and Demand System Approach to Development of Bridge Management Strategies

Published:2003-09 Issue:3 Volume:9 Page:117-131
ISSN:1076-0342
Container-title:Journal of Infrastructure Systems
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Infrastruct. Syst.

Author:

Adey Bryan¹,Hajdin Rade²,Brühwiler Eugen³

Affiliation:

1. Dr. of Civil Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and Civil and Environmental Engineering, Maintenance and Safety of Structures Division (MCS), CH 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

2. Visiting Professor, Dr. of Systems Engineering, Dept. of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Univ. of Pennsylvania, 220 South 33rd Street, 270 Towne Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315.

3. Professor, Dr. of Civil Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Maintenance and Safety of Structures Division (MCS), CH 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Publisher

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

Subject

Civil and Structural Engineering

Link

http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%291076-0342%282003%299%3A3%28117%29

Reference27 articles.

1. Adey B. (2002). “A supply and demand system approach to the development of bridge management strategies.” PhD thesis 2519 The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne Switzerland.

2. Augusti G. and Ciampoli M. (1997). “Optimal distribution of seismic upgrading interventions to maximize the expected flow in a road network.” Proc. 7th Working Conf. on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems D. Frangopol R. Corotis and R. Rackwitz eds. International Federation for Information Processing 85–92.

3. Augusti G. Borri A. and Ciampoli M. (1995). “Optimal resource allocation for seismic reliability upgrading of existing structures and lifeline networks.” Proc. 6th Working Conf. on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems R. Rackwitz G. Augusti and A. Borri eds. International Federation for Information Processing 3–24.

4. Blanchard C. and Systermans Y. (1983). “Cost and benefits of road safety measures.” European Conference of Ministers of Transport Round Table 63 Paris.

5. Cambridge Systematics. (1997). Pontis release 3.2 users manual American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Inc. Washington D.C.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Life-Cycle Assessment of Deteriorating RC Bridges Using Artificial Neural Networks;Journal of Infrastructure Systems;2022-06

2. Assessing the condition state of a concrete bridge combining visual inspection and nonlinear deterioration model;Structure and Infrastructure Engineering;2022-05-31

3. Life-cycle performance assessment of existing bridges based on artificial neural networks;Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Life-Cycle Sustainability and Innovations;2021-04-19

4. Identifying the Input Uncertainties to Quantify When Prioritizing Railway Assets for Risk-Reducing Interventions;CivilEng;2020-08-19

5. Sustainability-Informed Bridge Ranking under Scour Based on Transportation Network Performance and Multiattribute Utility;Journal of Bridge Engineering;2018-10