An Ontological Analysis for Comparison of the Concepts of Sustainable Building and Intelligent Building-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An Ontological Analysis for Comparison of the Concepts of Sustainable Building and Intelligent Building

Published:2024-04 Issue:4 Volume:150 Page:
ISSN:0733-9364
Container-title:Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
language:en
Short-container-title:J. Constr. Eng. Manage.

Author:

Borhani Alireza¹^ORCID,Borhani Atieh²,Dossick Carrie Sturts³^ORCID,Jupp Julie⁴

Affiliation:

1. Research Associate, College of Built Environments, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 (corresponding author). ORCID: .

2. Formerly, Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Washington, Columbus, OH 43017.

3. Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. ORCID: .

4. Associate Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.

Publisher

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

Link

https://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13711

Reference47 articles.

1. Detection and classification of the behavior of people in an intelligent building by camera;Ahmed H. S.;Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst.,2013

2. Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings

3. Bean, F., M. De Groote, and J. Volt. 2017. “Opening the door to smart buildings.” In Driving the transition with EU directives. Brussels, Belgium: Buildings Performance Institute Europe.

4. Borhani A. A. Borhani C. S. Dossick and J. Jupp. 2022. “Smart building conceptualization: A comparative analysis of literature and standards.” In Proc. Construction Research Congress 2022 310–318. Reston VA: ASCE.

5. Smart buildings using IoT technologies;Brad B. S.;Constr. Unique Build. Struct.,2014