Abstract
In the aftermath of World War II, states created a complex set of bilateral and multilateral institutions to govern international aviation markets. National governments concluded bilateral agreements to regulate airport entry and capacity and delegated to the airlines, through the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the authority to set fares and the terms of service in international markets. The resulting mixture of public and private institutions produced a de facto cartel that lasted for more than thirty years. Consistent with the Rational Design framework put forth by Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal, I argue that the institutions states created reflect the bargaining and incentive problems generated by international aviation markets. This case provides support for four of the Rational Design conjectures and slightly contradicts three others.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Malaysia–Singapore airspace dispute, 2018–2019: A legal and political analysis;Social Sciences & Humanities Open;2024
2. Flying flags: nationality, sovereignty, and airline liberalization;Review of International Political Economy;2022-12-13
3. Introduction;Lawful by Design;2022-01-20
4. Bibliography;Lawful by Design;2022-01-20
5. Appendix 1: Codebook;Lawful by Design;2022-01-20