Gender issues in fundamental physics: Strumia’s bibliometric analysis fails to account for key confounders and confuses correlation with causation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Gender issues in fundamental physics: Strumia’s bibliometric analysis fails to account for key confounders and confuses correlation with causation

Published:2021 Issue:1 Volume:2 Page:263-272
ISSN:2641-3337
Container-title:Quantitative Science Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Ball Philip¹,Britton T. Benjamin²^ORCID,Hengel Erin³^ORCID,Moriarty Philip⁴^ORCID,Oliver Rachel A.⁵^ORCID,Rippon Gina⁶^ORCID,Saini Angela⁷,Wade Jessica⁸^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Freelance Writer, London

2. Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ

3. Department of Economics, University of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, L69 7ZH

4. School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

5. Department of Materials Science, University of Cambridge, 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge CB3 0FS

6. Professor Emeritus of Cognitive NeuroImaging, Brain Centre, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET

7. Science Journalist, London

8. Department of Physics, Imperial College London South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ

Publisher

MIT Press - Journals

Subject

Aerospace Engineering

Link

http://direct.mit.edu/qss/article-pdf/2/1/263/1906537/qss_a_00117.pdf

Reference45 articles.

1. Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories;Aksnes;SAGE Open,2019

2. Paper trail reveals references go unread by citing authors;Ball;Nature,2002

3. Nordic impact: Article productivity and citation patterns in sixteen Nordic sociology departments;Bjarnason;Acta Sociologica,2002

4. Societal inequalities amplify gender gaps in math;Breda;Science,2018

5. Gender differences in grant and personnel award funding rates at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research based on research content area: A retrospective analysis;Burns;PLOS Medicine,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Academic free speech or right-wing grievance?;Digital Discovery;2023

2. Reply to commentaries about “Gender issues in fundamental physics: A bibliometric analysis”;Quantitative Science Studies;2021

3. L’Affaire Strumia reveals troubling gatekeeping values and outcomes at Quantitative Science Studies;Quantitative Science Studies;2021