Methodological and Cognitive Biases in Science: Issues for Current Research and Ways to Counteract Them

Author:

Fernández Pinto Manuela1

Affiliation:

1. Universidad de los Andes

Abstract

Abstract Arguments discrediting the value-free ideal of science have left us with the question of how to distinguish desirable values from biases that compromise the reliability of research. In this paper, I argue for a characterization of cognitive biases as deviations of thought processes that systematically lead scientists to the wrong conclusions. In particular, cognitive biases could help us understand a crucial issue in science today: how systematic error is introduced in research outcomes, even when research is evaluated as of good quality. To conclude, I suggest that some debiasing mechanisms have great potential for countering implicit methodological biases in science.

Publisher

MIT Press

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary

Reference69 articles.

1. Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce;Anderson;Hypatia,2004

2. Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review;Bekelman;JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association,2003

3. Eliminating Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the Intensive Care Unit;Berenholtz;Critical Care Medicine,2004

4. Influences on the Quality of Published Drug Studies;Bero;International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,1996

5. Changing Attitudes on Implicit Versus Explicit Measures. What Is the Different?;Briñol,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3