Author:
Goldthau Andreas,Sovacool Benjamin K.
Abstract
This article explores competing interpretive frames regarding shale gas in Bulgaria, Poland, and Romania. These countries face the choice of embracing shale gas as a potential revolutionizing domestic source of energy, against the backdrop of Russia serving as the dominant gas supplier. This makes them interesting cases for studying how policy narratives and discourses coalesce around a novel technology. The findings, which are based on sixty-six semistructured research interviews, point to differing and indeed competing frames, ranging from national security, environmental boons to economic sellout and authoritarianism, with different sets of institutions sharing those frames. This suggests that enhancing energy security by way of deploying novel energy technologies such as shale gas fracking is not simply a function of resource endowments and technological progress. Instead, it is the result of complex dynamics unfolding among social stakeholders and the related discursive processes, which eventually will determine whether—or not—shale gas will go global.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Global and Planetary Change
Reference32 articles.
1. Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism
2. Shale We Drill? Discourse Dynamics in UK Fracking Debates
3. “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing
4. Brasier, Kathryn J., Matthew R. Filteau, Diane K. McLaughlin, Jeffrey Jacquet, Richard C. Stedman, Timothy W. Kelsey, and Stephan J. Goetz. 2011. Residents’ Perceptions of Community and Environmental Impacts From Development of Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale: A Comparison of Pennsylvania and New York Cases. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 26 (1): 32–61.
5. Brown, Erica, Christopher Borick, Barry G. Rabe, and Thomas Ivacko. 2013. Public Opinion on Fracking: Perspectives from Michigan and Pennsylvania. Issues in Energy and Environmental Policy 3 (May).
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献