Abstract
Abstract
The political economy of lithium, a “critical mineral” for the renewable energy transition, is marked by two striking developments. First, Global North governments that have historically offshored mining are onshoring lithium to enhance “supply chain security.” Second, these governments have committed to “sustainably sourcing” lithium. In this article, I theorize both developments in terms of a novel security–sustainability nexus: an interlocking set of policies and justifications that promote lithium extraction and emphasize the environmental credentials of Global North mining. The security–sustainability nexus evidences an alignment between state and corporate interests. For public officials, onshoring policies counter China’s “dominance” over battery supply chains. For mining and auto firms, onshoring translates into lucrative incentives, supply security, and reputational benefits. However, despite this state–corporate alignment, the tensions within the security–sustainability nexus illuminate the contradictions of green capitalism. I conclude that the geopolitical and socioenvironmental conflicts over the material foundations of the energy transition are reshaping the inequalities linked to extractive sectors.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Global and Planetary Change
Reference73 articles.
1. EU and Canada Launch Raw Materials Alliance;Aarup;POLITICO Pro,2021
2. Green Industrial Policy and the Global Transformation of Climate Politics;Allan;Global Environmental Politics,2021
3. Green Economy Plans Fuel New Metals and Energy “Supercycle.”;Ambrose;The Guardian,2021
4. Chinese Assessments of “Critical” and “Strategic” Raw Materials: Concepts, Categories, Policies, and Implications;Andersson;Extractive Industries and Society,2020
5. Regulating Resource Use;Bakker,2008
Cited by
48 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献