Unconscious Perception of Vernier Offsets

Author:

Amerio Pietro1ORCID,Michel Matthias12ORCID,Goerttler Stephan1ORCID,Peters Megan A. K.3ORCID,Cleeremans Axel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Consciousness, Cognition & Computation Group, Center for Research in Cognition & Neurosciences, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles

2. Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness, New York University

3. Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine

Abstract

Abstract The comparison between conscious and unconscious perception is a cornerstone of consciousness science. However, most studies reporting above-chance discrimination of unseen stimuli do not control for criterion biases when assessing awareness. We tested whether observers can discriminate subjectively invisible offsets of Vernier stimuli when visibility is probed using a bias-free task. To reduce visibility, stimuli were either backward masked or presented for very brief durations (1–3 milliseconds) using a modern-day Tachistoscope. We found some behavioral indicators of perception without awareness, and yet, no conclusive evidence thereof. To seek more decisive proof, we simulated a series of Bayesian observer models, including some that produce visibility judgements alongside type-1 judgements. Our data are best accounted for by observers with slightly suboptimal conscious access to sensory evidence. Overall, the stimuli and visibility manipulations employed here induced mild instances of blindsight-like behavior, making them attractive candidates for future investigation of this phenomenon.

Funder

F.R.S.-FNRS Research Project

Fondation Université libre de Bruxelles

F.R.S.-FNRS Grant

Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Fellowship in the Brain, Mind, & Consciousness Program

ERC AdG Grant

Publisher

MIT Press

Reference77 articles.

1. The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning;Ahissar;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2004

2. Revisiting the metacontrast dissociation: Comparing sensitivity across different measures and tasks;Ansorge;Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2009

3. Is blindsight like normal, near-threshold vision?;Azzopardi;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,1997

4. Visual processing: Conscious until proven otherwise;Balsdon;Royal Society Open Science,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3