Affiliation:
1. 1Bangor University
2. 2Université Catholique de Louvain
3. 3University of Birmingham
4. 4University of Nottingham
Abstract
Abstract
A hallmark of human social interaction is the ability to consider other people's mental states, such as what they see, believe, or desire. Prior neuroimaging research has predominantly investigated the neural mechanisms involved in computing one's own or another person's perspective and largely ignored the question of perspective selection. That is, which brain regions are engaged in the process of selecting between self and other perspectives? To address this question, the current fMRI study used a behavioral paradigm that required participants to select between competing visual perspectives. We provide two main extensions to current knowledge. First, we demonstrate that brain regions within dorsolateral prefrontal and parietal cortices respond in a viewpoint-independent manner during the selection of task-relevant over task-irrelevant perspectives. More specifically, following the computation of two competing visual perspectives, common regions of frontoparietal cortex are engaged to select one's own viewpoint over another's as well as select another's viewpoint over one's own. Second, in the absence of conflict between the content of competing perspectives, we showed a reduced engagement of frontoparietal cortex when judging another's visual perspective relative to one's own. This latter finding provides the first brain-based evidence for the hypothesis that, in some situations, another person's perspective is automatically and effortlessly computed, and thus, less cognitive control is required to select it over one's own perspective. In doing so, we provide stronger evidence for the claim that we not only automatically compute what other people see but also, in some cases, we compute this even before we are explicitly aware of our own perspective.
Reference69 articles.
1. Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind?;Aichhorn;Neuroimage,2006
2. Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region.;Allison;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2000
3. Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and false belief ascription.;Back;Cognition,2010
4. False-belief understanding in infants.;Baillargeon;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2010
5. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.;Bargh,1994
Cited by
86 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献