Author:
Diamond Shari Seidman,Lempert Richard O.
Abstract
Sound legal decision-making frequently requires the assistance of scientists and engineers. The survey we conducted with the cooperation of the American Academy examines the views of the legal system held by some of the nation's most distinguished scientists and engineers, what motivates them to participate or to refuse to assist in lawsuits when asked, and their assessment of their experiences when they do participate. The survey reveals that a majority of the responding scientists and engineers will agree to participate when asked, and when they turn down requests, the most common reasons are lack of time and absence of relevant expertise. Dissatisfaction with legal procedures is also a deterrent, but our respondents indicated that some procedural changes would make their participation more likely. In addition, participation appears to be associated with a greater belief in the ability of the legal system to deal well with scientific matters.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Political Science and International Relations,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. ИЛМИЙ ХОДИМЛАР ҲУҚУҚИЙ МАҚОМИНИ БЕЛГИЛАШНИНГ АЙРИМ МАСАЛАЛАРИ;Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари / Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук / Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences.;2024-07-06
2. Distinctive Judicial-Tailored Causation References of Construction Accidents;KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering;2022-06-28
3. Evidence as a Multidisciplinary Field;Evidential Legal Reasoning;2022-05-31
4. The Legal Status of Scientists in Russia and Abroad;Science Governance and Scientometrics;2021-12-30