Abstract
Abstract
Governments around the world use short-term reelection strategies. This is problematic if governments can maximize their reelection chances by prioritizing short-term spending before an election over long-term reforms. This paper tests whether longer program exposure has a causal effect on election outcomes in the context of a large antipoverty program in India. Using a regression-discontinuity framework, the results show that length of program exposure lowers electoral support for the government. The paper discusses a couple of potential explanations, finding that the most plausible mechanism is that voters hold the government accountable for the program's implementation quality.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference55 articles.
1. Opportunistic Political Cycles: Test in a Young Democracy Setting,;Akhmedov;Quarterly Journal of Economics,2004
2. A Model of the Political Economy of the United States,;Alesina;American Political Science Review,1993
3. Politics and Business Cycles in Industrial Democracies,;Alesina;Economic Policy,1989
4. The Impact of Indian Job Guarantee Scheme on Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment;Azam;IZA discussion paper,2012
5. Conditional Cash Transfers, Political Participation, and Voting Behavior;Baez;IZA discussion paper,2012
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献