Affiliation:
1. Berea College
2. University of Western Ontario and NBER
3. American University
Abstract
Abstract
Using novel data from the Berea Panel Study, we show that the beauty wage premium for college graduates exists only in jobs where attractiveness is plausibly a productive characteristic. A large premium exists in jobs with substantial amounts of interpersonal interaction but not in jobs that require working with information. This finding is inconsistent with employer taste-based discrimination, which would favor attractive workers in all jobs. Unique task data address concerns that measurement error in the importance of interpersonal tasks may bias empirical work toward finding employer discrimination. Our conclusions are in stark contrast to the findings of existing research.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference49 articles.
1. Agopsowicz, Andrew, ChrisRobinson, RalphStinebrickner, and ToddStinebrickner, “Careers and Mismatch for College Graduates: College and Non-College Jobs,” Journal of Human Resources (forthcoming).
2. Altonji, Joseph G., and Charles R.Pierret, “Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination,” Quarterly Journal of Economics116 (2001), 313–350.
3. Arcidiacono, Peter
, “Ability Sorting and the Returns to College Major,” Journal of Econometrics121 (2004), 343–375.
4. Autor, David H., and Michael J.Handel, “Putting Tasks to the Test: Human Capital, Job Tasks, and Wages,” Journal of Labor Economics31 (2013), S59–S95.
5. Becker, Gary S.
, The Economics of Discrimination (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957).
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献