The tip of the iceberg: A call to embrace anti-localizationism in human neuroscience research

Author:

Noble Stephanie1234,Curtiss Joshua1356,Pessoa Luiz78,Scheinost Dustin49101112

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States

2. Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States

3. Center for Cognitive and Brain Health, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States

4. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States

5. Department of Applied Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States

6. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States

7. Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States

8. Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States

9. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States

10. Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States

11. Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States

12. Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States

Abstract

Abstract Human neuroscience research remains largely preoccupied with mapping distinct brain areas to complex psychological processes and features of mental health disorders. While this reductionist and localizationist perspective has resulted in several substantive contributions to the field, it has long been viewed as only a piece of the puzzle. Emerging evidence now empirically demonstrates how a historical reliance on localizationist techniques may underlie recent challenges to reproducibility and translation in human neuroscience. To advance discovery, we must collectively better incorporate complex systems and machine-learning approaches that better capture the multidimensional, dynamic, and interacting nature of the brain. Moreover, we must begin to contend with how to best integrate complementary modalities beyond the brain to better understand complex mental processes.

Publisher

MIT Press

Reference51 articles.

1. Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain;Anderson;Behavioral and Brain Sciences,2010

2. A call for more clarity around causality in neuroscience;Barack;Trends in Neurosciences,2022

3. Modularity in cognition: framing the debate;Barrett;Psychological Review,2006

4. The ‘nation’s psychiatrist’takes stock, with frustration;Barry;New York Times,2022

5. Network neuroscience;Bassett;Nature Neuroscience,2017

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3