A comparison of fMRI presurgical mapping techniques with intraoperative brain mapping-based validation

Author:

Radwan Ahmed M.12,Emsell Louise1234,Vansteelandt Kristof234,Cleeren Evy56,Peeters Ronald7,De Vleeschouwer Steven268,Theys Tom268,Dupont Patrick29,Sunaert Stefan127

Affiliation:

1. Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

2. Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

3. Neuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

4. Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Center (UPC), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

5. Department of Neurology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

6. Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

7. Department of Radiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

8. Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

9. Department of Neurosciences, Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) could enable preoperative risk assessment and intraoperative guidance for patients who cannot undergo task-based fMRI (tbfMRI). To ascertain rsfMRI’s applicability, we investigated differences in accuracy between tbfMRI with a voxel size of 1.8 x 1.8 x 3.2 mm³ and rsfMRI acquired with single-echo (sTE) with a voxel size of 2 x 2 x 2.2 mm³ and multiecho (mTE) with a voxel size of 3 x 3 x 3 mm³ using intraoperative mapping with direct electrical stimulations (DES) as the ground truth. Functional sensory-motor mapping results of hands and feet were spatially compared relative to positive (pDES, functional effect) and negative (nDES, no functional effect) coordinates in 16 preoperative patients. A general linear model analysis was used for tbfMRI, and seed-based analysis (SBA) for rsfMRI. Minimum Euclidean distances between fMRI and DES were calculated and compared between fMRI methods. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare accuracy and determine distance cutoffs for fMRI agreement with DES, and binary agreement rates were compared at different cutoffs. Two-part mixed-effects linear models were used to compare fMRI methods while accounting for unequal intersubject DES repetition. Only minor differences were found between fMRI methods in unthresholded distances (mean differences ~2 mm). ROCs and binary agreement measures showed comparable accuracy for tbfMRI and sTE-rsfMRI at 2 mm, but mildly worse for sTE-rsfMRI at 3 mm and mTE-rsfMRI. However, differences in relative accuracy between sTE-rsfMRI and mTE-rsfMRI were minor when the same distance cutoff was applied to all methods. This was also reflected in comparing binary agreement rates and confirmed by the two-part linear models, which showed no significant differences between fMRI methods and a significant effect of DES response. A similar accuracy for SBA rsfMRI functional sensory-motor mapping compared with tbfMRI for the hands and feet indicates that rsfMRI may be suitable for presurgical mapping. The differences in relative accuracy between sTE-rsfMRI and mTE-rsfMRI warrant further investigation in a larger sample.

Publisher

MIT Press

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3