Abstract
In Norway, the institution of the welfare state and trust in the government defined the country’s approach to tackling the pandemic. In particular, the government’s strategy to activate the cultural concept of dugnad (voluntary, reciprocal communal work), which relies on an equal standing of all participants, plays into the national imaginary of an egalitarian and just society. However, like in other countries, COVID-19 has put the spotlight on inequalities in access to healthcare, information, adequate housing, and more. Investigating infection measures and their indirect consequences can clarify which values and people are given priority in a crisis and who is seen as belonging to Norwegian society.
This article points to the pandemic as a magnifying glass revealing the lack of enough emergency care nurses, physicians, equipment, hospital and psychiatry beds, adequate health literacy efforts and more. Moreover, it magnifies heteronormative and Eurocentric ideas of who makes up a family, compounded by nationalistic notions of who is Norwegian enough to belong.
By activating dugnad, politicians transferred their responsibilities as elected leaders to individual citizens, leading to the growth of socioeconomic inequalities and health disparities during the pandemic while also resulting in the poor communication of the long-term and indirect costs of pandemic measures.
Publisher
University of Victoria Libraries
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology
Reference37 articles.
1. Abram, Simone. 2018. “Likhet Is Not Equality: Discussing Norway in English and Norwegian.” In Egalitarianism in Scandinavia: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Synnøve Bendixsen, Mary Bente Bringslid and Halvard Vike, 87–108. Chambery: Springer International Publishing.
2. Baetke, Walter. 2005 [1965]. Wörterbuch zur altnordischen Prosaliteratur [Dictionary for Norse prose]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
3. Bugge, Stella. 2021. “Hadde Sven vært skilt, kunne han ha sluppet karantenehotell” [If Sven had been divorced, he could have avoided the quarantine hotel]. Verdens Gang. 6 May. https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/yRWxO2/hadde-sven-vaert-skilt-kunne-han-ha-sluppet-karantenehotell.
4. Byggenæringens Landsforening. 2021. “Strengeste innreiseregler siden 12. Mars” [Strictest entry rules since 12 March]. BNL.no. 27 January. https://www.bnl.no/artikler/2021/skjerpelser-innreiseregler/.
5. De Lauri, Antonio, and Kari Telle. “COVID 19, ‘dugnad’ and Social Control in Bergen and beyond.” City and Society 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12367
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献