Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a new framework for understanding technology-integrated assessment in higher education based on a review of the literature using the assessment design in a digital world framework (Bearman et al., 2022) as a lens. Our review (Madland et al., 2024) revealed both congruities and incongruities between the literature and the framework, leading to the need for further work to accurately conceptualize technology-integrated assessment. In this article, we contribute to the literature on technology-integrated assessment in higher education by proposing the technology-integrated assessment framework. This paper marks an important step in extending our understanding of the factors influencing instructors who integrate technology into their assessment practice and promoting ethical and equitable approaches to technology-integrated assessment in higher education.
Publisher
University of Victoria Libraries
Reference59 articles.
1. Abrahart, R. (2023, June 12). Rejection of legal duty of care marks a bad day for students’ rights. Wonkhe. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/rejection-of-legal-duty-of-care-marks-a-bad-day-for-students-rights/
2. Alexander v University of Lethbridge. (2022). https://canlii.ca/t/jpxvz
3. Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. (2019). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of mobile learning system in higher education. IEEE Access, 7, 174673–174686. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957206
4. Aluko, F. R., & Omidire, M. F. (2020). A critical review of student assessment practices in distance education in an emerging economy: Benchmarking practices against policy. Africa Education Review, 17(5), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2021.1920842
5. Baniasadi, A., Salehi, K., Khodaie, E., Bagheri Noaparast, K., & Izanloo, B. (2023). Fairness in Classroom Assessment: A Systematic Review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00636-z