EVERYDAY RESISTANCE IN MAKING ONESELF VISIBLE: YOUNG ADULTS’ NEGOTIATIONS WITH INSTITUTIONAL SOCIAL CONTROL IN YOUTH SERVICES

Author:

Kallio Jenni,Honkatukia Päivi

Abstract

This article concerns young adults’ institutional encounters with professionals in the context of youth services. The encounters are analyzed as institutional social control — the practices and mechanisms that steer young people’s conduct in accordance with the normative order. We make visible young adults’ acts of everyday resistance as they negotiate, problematize, and challenge aspects of institutional social control. The data consist of 17 life-course interviews with young adults aged 18 to 24 who visited youth shelters organized by the Finnish Red Cross. Participants expressed criticism of the normative expectations and the categorizing and controlling practices that they encountered. However, there is a danger that in the institutional encounters, their acts of everyday resistance are not acknowledged as political agency; instead, stereotypical notions strengthen the interpretation of the young adults as problematic or in need of protection. This lack of recognition may contribute to increased vulnerability in the young people the institutions are intended to support.

Publisher

University of Victoria Libraries

Subject

General Medicine

Reference54 articles.

1. Aaltonen, S., Berg, P., & Ikäheimo, S. (2015). Nuoret luukulla. Kolme näkökulmaa syrjäytymiseen ja nuorten asemaan palvelujärjestelmässä [Youth at the agency hatch. Three perspectives on exclusion and the position of young people in the service system]. Nuorisotutkimusverkosto/Nuorisotutkimusseura, julkaisuja, 160. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-442-7

2. Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In A. Sen & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 88–94). World Institute for Development Economics Research. Clarendon Press.

3. Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L., & Stefánsson, K. (2012). The future of the welfare state: Rethinking universalism. In A. Anttonen, L. Häikiö, & K. Stefansson (Eds.), Welfare state, universalism and diversity (pp. 187–196). Edward Elgar.

4. Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. AltaMira Press.

5. Blackman, S., & Rogers, R. (Eds.). (2017). Youth marginality in Britain: Contemporary studies of austerity. Policy Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3