Improved indices of insulin resistance and insulin secretion for use in genetic and population studies of type2 diabetes mellitus

Author:

Jenkins Arthur B,Samaras Katherine,Carey David GP,Kelly Paul,Campbell Lesley V

Abstract

AbstractHomeostasis model assessment (HOMA) provides indices of insulin secretion (β) and insulin resistance (R) derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting plasma insulin (FPI) levels. However, these indices could not account for a significant heritability of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (h2 = 0.75, P < 0.01) in a group of 214 female twins. This result is consistent with a misclassification between effects due to insulin secretion and resistance in the HOMA indices. We report here evidence of such misclassification in the HOMA indices and describe a minor modification to the model which corrects it. Direct measures of insulin resistance (euglycaemic clamp) and secretion (i.v. glucose bolus) were obtained in 43 non-diabetic subjects. Heritability was estimated by statistical modelling of genetic and environmental influences in data from 214 non-diabetic female subjects. Modified HOMA (HOMA′) indices were obtained from β′ = (Ln(FPI)–c)/FPG and R′ = (Ln(FPI)–c)* FPG where c is a constant derived from regression analysis of Ln(FPI) vs FPG. Indices from both models correlated with the direct measures similarly (r = 0.63 (R), 0.49 (R′), 0.45 (β), 0.39 (β′), all P < 0.01). Directly measured insulin resistance and secretion were not significantly correlated (r = 0.13, P = 0.21). However, unmodified HOMA- and R were strongly related (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001 vs 0.13) demonstrating substantial misclassification. The relationship between β′ and R′ (r = 0.13) was not different from that between the two direct measures and significant heritability of β′ (h2 = 0.68, P < 0.01) and R′ (h2 = 0.59, P < 0.05) was evident in the twin data. The proposed modification to HOMA significantly reduces misclassification and reveals separate components of insulin resistance and insulin secretion in the heritability of FPG. Twin Research (2000) 3, 148–151.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3