Social Welfare in Singapore and Sweden: Differences in Organisational Systems of Health Care, Social Security and Rehabilitation
-
Published:2008-04-01
Issue:1
Volume:3
Page:30-38
-
ISSN:1833-8550
-
Container-title:International Journal of Disability Management
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int. J. Disabil. Manag.
Author:
Olsson Inger,Millet Patrick,Vinberg Stig,Olsson Göran,Bergroth Alf,Landstad Bodil J.
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of the study is to describe and compare the health care, social security and rehabilitation systems in Singapore and Sweden. Two fundamental differences can be identified. First, the system in Singapore are strongly oriented towards a free market system, while Sweden's demonstrates strong public control. Second, following from how the systems are oriented, Singaporeans are expected to have a higher degree of independence and control over their health care, social security and rehabilitation. It appears that Singapore has had greater success in attaining and maintaining a system of health promotion, which influences the three systems. However, the Swedish welfare system provides greater security to those who are in need of health care, social security and rehabilitation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Health(social science)
Reference62 articles.
1. Almond, G.A., Powell Jr., G.B., Strom, K. & Russell, J.D. (Eds.). (2004). Comparative politics. A theoretical framework. New York: Pearson Longman.
2. AFS 2001:1 (Arbetsmiljoverkets forfattningssamling (Work Environment Authority Provisions) (2001). Systematiskt arbetsmiljoarbete (Systematic Work Environment Management). Retrieved November 13, 2007, from http://www3.lu.se/pers/Arbetsmiljo_ halsa/AFS2001_01.pdf
3. Swedish healthcare under pressure
4. Medical Savings Accounts in Singapore: A Critical Inquiry
5. Economic Challenges and Political Innovation: The Case of Singapore