Author:
Fellman Johan,Eriksson Aldur W.
Abstract
AbstractTheorems, proofs, laws and rules are commonly named according to the presumed investigator, but often earlier investigators have contributed substantially to the findings. One example of this is Hellin's law, which was named after Hellin, although he was not the first to discover it. In research on twinning and higher multiple maternities, the law has played a central role because it is approximately correct, despite showing discrepancies that are difficult to explain or eliminate. Several improvements to this law have been proposed. In this study, we re-examine some old papers to provide an overview of the scientists who have contributed to the genesis and the improvements of this law. In addition, we consider more recent contributions in which Hellin's law has been discussed and evaluated. It has been mathematically proven that Hellin's law does not hold as a general rule. However, most studies are based on empirical rates of multiple maternities, ignoring random errors. Such studies can never confirm the law, but only serve to identify errors too large to be characterized as random.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference39 articles.
1. Bertillon, M. (1874). Des combinaisons de sexe dans les grossesses gemellares (doubles et triples), de leur cause et de leur caractere ethnique [Sex combination in multiple maternities (twin and triplet), their causes and their ethnic characteristics]. Bulletins de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 9, 267-290.
2. Brown, S. (1872). Report on the Eighth International Statistical Congress, St. Petersburg, August, 1872. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 35, 431-457.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献