Theoretical Challenges of Indigenous Archaeology: Setting an Agenda

Author:

McNiven Ian J.

Abstract

AbstractIndigenous archaeology focuses on laudable processes of collaborative community research and decolonization. In contrast, theoretical contributions of Indigenous archaeology in terms of interpreting archaeological materials have been minimally articulated beyond praxis. Does Indigenous archaeology have an interpretative theoretical agenda? This paper addresses this question and articulates an agenda through distillation of theoretical developments and concerns from the considerable literature on Indigenous archaeology that has emerged from the Americas, Australia, and Africa over the past two decades. A shared fundamental concern is challenging ontological and epistemological divides and dualisms within mainstream Western archaeology. Two key dimensions of Indigenous archaeology are elaborated to provide broader scope to contextualize and address these theoretical challenges. First,encountering the pastchallenges objectivist tangibility of the archaeological record with ancestral presence and contexts where artifactual absence is the (in)tangible signature of spiritual association. Second,historicing the presentchallenges secularist archaeologies of a detached past with archaeologies of the more familiar ethnographically known recent past linked to identity and diachronic explorations of ontology and spiritualism. An agenda that embraces these theoretical challenges presents major opportunities for mainstream archaeology to reorient its Eurocentric focus and produce more cross-culturally relevant and culturally nuanced and sensitive understandings of the past.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Museology,Archeology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History

Reference148 articles.

1. Kearney Amanda 2010 An Ethnoarchaeology of Engagement. Journal of Ethnoarchaeology and Experimental Archaeology 2:99–120.

2. Two Bears Davina R. 2008 'Íhoosh'aah, Learning by Doing: The Navajo Nation Archaeology Department Student Training Program. In Collaborating at the Trowel's Edge, edited by Stephen W. Silliman, pp. 188–207. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

3. Smith Claire 2007 The Indigenous Transformation of Archaeological Practice. The SAA Archaeological Record 7:35–39.

4. David Bruno , Lamb Lara , Delannoy Jean-Jacques , Pivoru Frank , Rowe Cassandra , Pivoru Max , Frank Tony , Frank Nick , Fairbum Andrew , and Pivoru Ruth 2012 Poromoi Tamu and the Case of the Drowning Village: History, Lost Places and the Stories We Tell. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16:319–345.

5. Patrik Linda E. 1985 Is There an Archaeological Record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8:27–62.

Cited by 66 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3