Abstract
AbstractIndigenous archaeology focuses on laudable processes of collaborative community research and decolonization. In contrast, theoretical contributions of Indigenous archaeology in terms of interpreting archaeological materials have been minimally articulated beyond praxis. Does Indigenous archaeology have an interpretative theoretical agenda? This paper addresses this question and articulates an agenda through distillation of theoretical developments and concerns from the considerable literature on Indigenous archaeology that has emerged from the Americas, Australia, and Africa over the past two decades. A shared fundamental concern is challenging ontological and epistemological divides and dualisms within mainstream Western archaeology. Two key dimensions of Indigenous archaeology are elaborated to provide broader scope to contextualize and address these theoretical challenges. First,encountering the pastchallenges objectivist tangibility of the archaeological record with ancestral presence and contexts where artifactual absence is the (in)tangible signature of spiritual association. Second,historicing the presentchallenges secularist archaeologies of a detached past with archaeologies of the more familiar ethnographically known recent past linked to identity and diachronic explorations of ontology and spiritualism. An agenda that embraces these theoretical challenges presents major opportunities for mainstream archaeology to reorient its Eurocentric focus and produce more cross-culturally relevant and culturally nuanced and sensitive understandings of the past.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Museology,Archeology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference148 articles.
1. Kearney Amanda 2010 An Ethnoarchaeology of Engagement. Journal of Ethnoarchaeology and Experimental Archaeology 2:99–120.
2. Two Bears Davina R. 2008 'Íhoosh'aah, Learning by Doing: The Navajo Nation Archaeology Department Student Training Program. In Collaborating at the Trowel's Edge, edited by Stephen W. Silliman, pp. 188–207. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
3. Smith Claire 2007 The Indigenous Transformation of Archaeological Practice. The SAA Archaeological Record 7:35–39.
4. David Bruno , Lamb Lara , Delannoy Jean-Jacques , Pivoru Frank , Rowe Cassandra , Pivoru Max , Frank Tony , Frank Nick , Fairbum Andrew , and Pivoru Ruth 2012 Poromoi Tamu and the Case of the Drowning Village: History, Lost Places and the Stories We Tell. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16:319–345.
5. Patrik Linda E. 1985 Is There an Archaeological Record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8:27–62.
Cited by
66 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献