Author:
Moore Christopher R.,Brooks Mark J.,Kimball Larry R.,Newman Margaret E.,Kooyman Brian P.
Abstract
AbstractResults of protein residue and lithic microwear analyses are reported for Paleoindian and Early Archaic stone tools from a Carolina bay sand rim on the Aiken Plateau of South Carolina, USA. Protein residue analysis is performed using crossover Immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), and indicates positive results for Bovidae, Cervidae, Galliformes, and Meleagris gallopavo. These results are complemented by a larger immunological study of 135 diagnostic hafted bifaces from South Carolina and Georgia. Among other species identified, bovid residue was found on multiple Paleoindian hafted bifaces, an Early Archaic hafted biface, and a Middle Archaic hafted biface. Results suggest continuity of species selection and availability across the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary and provide no support for the exploitation of extinct fauna. The data do provide compelling evidence for a demographic shift and/or regional extirpation of Bovidae possibly as late as the early mid-Holocene in the Southeast. In addition, microwear analysis of artifacts from Flamingo Bay indicate intensive hide scraping, antler boring, bone graving/planing/pointing, wood whittling, and hafting traces. Microwear data suggest intentional snap-fracture or bipolarization of exhausted or broken Clovis points for reuse as hide scrapers, and use of large bifacial knives and unifacial scrapers in intensive defleshing activities consistent with large animal butchery.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Museology,Archeology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Reference82 articles.
1. Anderson-Gerfaud Patricia 1981 Contribution Méthodologique à l’analyse des Microtraces d’utilisation sur les outils Préhistoriques. Thèse de 3° cycle, Université de Bordeaux I, Talence.
2. Semenov Sergei 1964 Prehistoric Technology. Cory, Adams and Mackay, London.
3. Kimball Larry R. 2013 Microwear Analysis of Clovis and Early Archaic Tools from 38AK469, Flamingo Bay, South Carolina. Technical Report on file at the Savannah River Archaeological Research Program (SRARP).
4. Eberhard Kevin H. , Sassaman Kenneth E. , and Brooks Mark J. 1994 Crosby Bay (38AK682): Paleoindian and Early Archaic Occupations at a Carolina Bay in Aiken County, South Carolina. South Carolina Antiquities 26:33–46.
5. Newman Margaret E. , Byrne Greg , Ceri Howard , Dimnik Leo S. , and Bridge Peter 1998 Immunological and DNA Analysis of Blood Residues from a Surgeon’s Kit Used in the American Civil War. Journal of Archaeological Science 25:553–557.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献