Selection of Response Criteria for Clinical Trials of Sarcoma Treatment

Author:

Schuetze Scott M.1,Baker Laurence H.1,Benjamin Robert S.2,Canetta Renzo3

Affiliation:

1. a Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

2. b Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

3. c Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA

Abstract

Abstract Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from mesenchymal tissues. A large number of new therapies are being evaluated in patients with sarcomas, and consensus criteria defining treatment responses are essential for comparison of results from studies completed by different research groups. The 1979 World Health Organization (WHO) handbook set forth operationally defined criteria for response evaluation in solid tumors that were updated in 2000 with the publication of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). There have been significant advances in tumor imaging, however, that are not reflected in the RECIST. For example, computed tomography (CT) slice thickness has been reduced from 10 mm to ≤2.5 mm, allowing for more reproducible and accurate measurement of smaller lesions. Combination of imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG-PET) and CT can provide investigators and clinicians with both anatomical and functional information regarding tumors, and there is now a large body of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of PET/CT and other newer imaging methods for the detection and staging of tumors as well as early determination of responses to therapy. The application of newer imaging methods has the potential to decrease both the sample sizes required for, and duration of, clinical trials by providing an early indication of therapeutic response that is well correlated with clinical outcomes, such as time to tumor progression or overall survival. The results summarized in this review support the conclusion that the RECIST and the WHO criteria for evaluation of response in solid tumors need to be modernized. In addition, there is a current need for prospective trials to compare new response criteria with established endpoints and to validate imaging-based response rates as surrogate endpoints for clinical trials of new agents for sarcoma and other solid tumors.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference51 articles.

1. Emerging treatments for soft tissue sarcoma of adults;Fahn;Expert Opin Emerg Drugs,2004

2. Soft tissue sarcomas of adults: State of the translational science;Borden;Clin Cancer Res,2003

3. New emerging drugs in soft tissue sarcoma;Milano;Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2006

4. Historic evidence and future directions in clinical trial therapy of solid tumors;Gollob;Oncology (Williston Park),2006

5. Some problems related to the design and analysis of clinical trials;Tannock;Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,1992

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3