Training for Medical Oncologists on Shared Decision-Making About Palliative Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Henselmans Inge123,van Laarhoven Hanneke W.M.43,de Haes Hanneke C.J.M.1,Tokat Meltem1,Engelhardt Ellen G.25,van Maarschalkerweerd Pomme E.A.1,Kunneman Marleen16,Ottevanger Petronella B.7,Dohmen Serge E.8,Creemers Geert-Jan9,Sommeijer Dirkje W.410,de Vos Filip Y.F.L.11,Smets Ellen M.A.123

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

4. Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

6. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

7. Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

8. Department of Internal Medicine, BovenIJ Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

9. Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

10. Department of Internal Medicine, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands

11. Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Background Systemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes limited benefit, while the burden can be high. This study examines the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) training for medical oncologists on observed SDM in standardized patient assessments. Materials and Methods A randomized controlled trial comparing training with standard practice was conducted. Medical oncologists and oncologists-in-training (n = 31) participated in a video-recorded, standardized patient assessment at baseline (T0) and after 4 months (T1, after training). The training was based on a four-stage SDM model and consisted of a reader, two group sessions (3.5 hours each), a booster session (1.5 hours), and a consultation card. The primary outcome was observed SDM as assessed with the Observing Patient Involvement scale (OPTION12) coded by observers blinded for arm. Secondary outcomes were observed SDM per stage, communication skills, and oncologists’ satisfaction with communication. Results The training had a significant and large effect on observed SDM in the simulated consultations (Cohen's f = 0.62) and improved observed SDM behavior in all four SDM stages (f = 0.39–0.72). The training improved oncologists’ information provision skills (f = 0.77), skills related to anticipating/responding to emotions (f = 0.42), and their satisfaction with the consultation (f = 0.53). Conclusion Training medical oncologists in SDM about palliative systemic treatment improves their performance in simulated consultations. The next step is to examine the effect of such training on SDM in clinical practice and on patient outcomes. Implications for Practice Systemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes limited benefit, while the burden can be high. Hence, applying the premises of shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended. SDM is increasingly advocated based on the ethical imperative to provide patient-centered care and the increasing evidence for beneficial patient outcomes. Few studies examined the effectiveness of SDM training in robust designs. This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that SDM training (10 hours) improves oncologists’ performance in consultations with standardized patients. The next step is to examine the effect of training on oncologists’ performance and patient outcomes in clinical practice.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference37 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3