Outcomes of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with at Least Three Lines of Systemic Chemotherapy

Author:

Fanotto Valentina1,Uccello Mario2,Pecora Irene3,Rimassa Lorenza4,Leone Francesco5,Rosati Gerardo6,Santini Daniele7,Giampieri Riccardo8,Di Donato Samantha9,Tomasello Gianluca10,Silvestris Nicola11,Pietrantonio Filippo12,Battaglin Francesca13,Avallone Antonio14,Scartozzi Mario15,Lutrino Eufemia Stefania16,Melisi Davide17,Antonuzzo Lorenzo18,Pellegrino Antonio19,Ferrari Laura1,Bordonaro Roberto2,Vivaldi Caterina3,Gerratana Lorenzo1,Bozzarelli Silvia4,Filippi Roberto5,Bilancia Domenico6,Russano Marco7,Aprile Giuseppe120

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncology, University and General Hospital, Udine, Italy

2. Department of Oncology, Garibaldi Nesima Hospital, Catania, Italy

3. Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Pisa, Italy

4. UO Oncologia Medica, Humanitas Cancer Center, Humanitas Research Hospital—IRCCS, Rozzano, (MI), Italy

5. Medical Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO, IRCCS, Turin, Italy

6. Medical Oncology, San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy

7. Medical Oncology, Campus Biomedico University, Roma, Italy

8. Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy

9. Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital, Prato, Italy

10. U.O. Oncologia, ASST di Cremona—Ospedale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy

11. Medical Oncology Unit, National Cancer Institute IRCCS “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy

12. Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy

13. Medical Oncology, IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy

14. Abdomen Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori—IRCCS—Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy

15. Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy

16. Medical Oncology, Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy

17. Medical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

18. Medical Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy

19. Medical Oncology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy

20. Department of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, ULSS8 Berica—East District, Vicenza, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background Second-line therapy has consistently demonstrated survival benefit if compared with best supportive care; however, there is limited evidence whether further lines of treatment may improve the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients. Materials and Methods Starting from a real-world cohort of 868 AGC patients, we retrospectively analyzed baseline parameters, tumor characteristics, and treatment data of those treated with at least three lines. Categorical features were described through cross-tables and chi-square test. We explored the impact of treatment intensity and progression-free survival (PFS) experienced in previous lines on PFS and overall survival in third-line by uni- and multivariate Cox regression models and described by Kaplan-Meier estimator plot with log-rank test. Results Overall, 300 patients were included in the analysis. The most common site of primary tumor was gastric body; 45.3% of cancers had an intestinal histotype, 14% were human epidermal growth receptor 2 positive. In third-line, 45.7% of patients received a single-agent chemotherapy, 49.7% a combination regimen. Patients who had experienced a first-line PFS ≥6.9 months had a better prognosis compared with those who had achieved a shorter one. Consistently, a second-line PFS ≥3.5 months positively influenced the prognosis. Patients receiving a third-line combination regimen had better outcomes compared with those treated with a single-agent chemotherapy. Conclusion Our real-world study confirms that selected AGC patients may receive third-line treatment. Longer PFS in previous lines or a more intense third-line treatment positively influenced prognosis. Further efforts are warranted to define the best therapeutic sequences, and to identify the optimal candidate for treatment beyond second-line.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3