Beliefs About Advanced Cancer Curability in Older Patients, Their Caregivers, and Oncologists

Author:

Loh Kah Poh1,Mohile Supriya G.1,Lund Jennifer L.2,Epstein Ronald1345,Lei Lianlian6,Culakova Eva1,McHugh Colin1,Wells Megan1,Gilmore Nikesha1,Mohamed Mostafa R.1,Kamen Charles1,Aarne Valerie1,Conlin Alison7,Bearden James8,Onitilo Adedayo9,Wittink Marsha3,Dale William10,Hurria Arti10,Duberstein Paul311

Affiliation:

1. James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA

2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA

4. Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA

5. Department of Medicine, Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA

6. Department of Public Health Services, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA

7. Pacific Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, Seattle, Washington, USA

8. Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA

9. Wisconsin NCORP, Weston, Wisconsin, USA

10. City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA

11. Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Ensuring older patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists have similar beliefs about curability is important. We investigated discordance in beliefs about curability in patient-oncologist and caregiver-oncologist dyads. Materials and Methods We used baseline data from a cluster randomized trial assessing whether geriatric assessment improves communication and quality of life in older patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Patients were aged ≥70 years with incurable cancer from community oncology practices. Patients, caregivers, and oncologists were asked: “What do you believe are the chances the cancer will go away and never come back with treatment?” Options were 100%, >50%, 50/50, <50%, and 0% (5-point scale). Discordance in beliefs about curability was defined as any difference in scale scores (≥3 points were severe). We used multivariate logistic regressions to describe correlates of discordance. Results Discordance was present in 60% (15% severe) of the 336 patient-oncologist dyads and 52% (16% severe) of the 245 caregiver-oncologist dyads. Discordance was less common in patient-oncologist dyads when oncologists practiced longer (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.97) and more common in non-Hispanic white patients (AOR 5.77, CI 1.90–17.50) and when patients had lung (AOR 1.95, CI 1.29–2.94) or gastrointestinal (AOR 1.55, CI 1.09–2.21) compared with breast cancer. Severe discordance was more common when patients were non-Hispanic white, had lower income, and had impaired social support. Caregiver-oncologist discordance was more common when caregivers were non-Hispanic white (AOR 3.32, CI 1.01–10.94) and reported lower physical health (AOR 0.88, CI 0.78–1.00). Severe discordance was more common when caregivers had lower income and lower anxiety level. Conclusion Discordance in beliefs about curability is common, occasionally severe, and correlated with patient, caregiver, and oncologist characteristics.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3