How Well Do Medical Oncologists Manage Chronic Cancer Pain? A National Survey

Author:

Breuer Brenda1,Chang Victor T.23,Von Roenn Jamie H.4,Gunten Charles56,Neugut Alfred I.78,Kaplan Ronald9,Wallenstein Sylvan10,Portenoy Russell K.111

Affiliation:

1. MJHS Institute for Innovation in Palliative Care, New York, New York, USA;

2. Section of Hematology/Oncology, Virginia New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, New Jersey, USA;

3. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA;

4. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA;

5. Hospice and Palliative Care, OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio, USA;

6. Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA;

7. Department of Medicine and the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA;

8. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA;

9. Department of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA;

10. Department of Preventive Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA;

11. Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background. Cancer pain is usually managed by oncologists, occasionally with input from specialists in hospice and palliative medicine (PLM) or pain medicine (PMD). We evaluated the knowledge of cancer pain management in these three specialty groups. Methods. Eight vignettes depicting challenging scenarios of patients with poorly controlled pain were developed; each had five or six treatment choices. Respondents indicated choices likely to be safe and efficacious as “true” and choices likely to be unsafe or inefficacious as “false.” Two questionnaires were created, each with four vignettes. Three anonymous mailings targeted geographically representative U.S. samples of 570 oncologists, 266 PMD specialists, and 280 PLM specialists, each randomly assigned one version of the questionnaire. Vignette scores were normalized to a 0–100 numeric rating scale (NRS); a score of 50 indicates that the number of correct choices equals the number of incorrect choices (consistent with guessing). Results. Overall response rate was 49% (oncologists, 39%; PMD specialists, 48%; and PLM specialists, 70%). Average vignette score ranges were 53.2–66.5, 45.6–65.6, and 50.8–72.0 for oncologists, PMD specialists, and PLM specialists, respectively. Oncologists scored lower than PLM specialists on both questionnaires and lower than PMD specialists on one. On a 0–10 NRS, oncologists rated their ability to manage pain highly (median 7, with an interquartile range [IQR] of 5–8). Lower ratings were assigned to pain-related training in medical school (median 3, with an IQR of 2–5) and residency/fellowship (median 5, with an IQR of 4–7). Oncologists older than 46–47 years rated their training lower than younger oncologists. Conclusion. These data suggest that oncologists and other medical specialists who manage cancer pain have knowledge deficiencies in cancer pain management. These gaps help clarify the need for pain management education.

Funder

Covidien Pharma

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference20 articles.

1. Evaluation of the prevalence, pattern and management of cancer pain in Oncology Department, The Royal Hospital, Oman;Faris;Gulf J Oncolog,2007

2. Prevalence and treatment of cancer pain in Italian oncological wards centres: A cross-sectional survey;Mercadante;Support Care Cancer,2008

3. National survey on prevalence of cancer pain;Liu;Chin Med Sci J,2001

4. Prevalence and management of cancer pain in South Africa;Beck;Pain,2001

5. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: A systematic review of the past 40 years;Van den Beuken-van Everdingen;Ann Oncol,2007

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3