Cell-Free DNA in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Spindler Karen-Lise G.12,Boysen Anders K.1,Pallisgård Niels23,Johansen Julia S.4,Tabernero Josep5,Sørensen Morten M.6,Jensen Benny V.4,Hansen Torben F.2,Sefrioui David7,Andersen Rikke F.8,Brandslund Ivan8,Jakobsen Anders2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncology Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

2. Department of Oncology Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark

3. Department of Pathology Roskilde Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark

4. Departments of Oncology and Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, Herlev, Denmark

5. Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

6. Department of Oncology Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

7. Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology EquIpe de Recherche Onco-Normande (IRON), Rouen University Hospital, Rouen Cedex, France

8. Department of Clinical Biochemistry Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background Circulating DNA can be detected and quantified in the blood of cancer patients and used for detection of tumor-specific genetic alterations. The clinical utility has been intensively investigated for the past 10 years. The majority of reports focus on analyzing the clinical potential of tumor-specific mutations, whereas the use of total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) quantification is somehow controversial and sparsely described in the literature, but holds important clinical information in itself. The purpose of the present report was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic value of total cfDNA in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with chemotherapy. In addition, we report on the overall performance of cfDNA as source for KRAS mutation detection. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase was performed by two independent investigators. Eligibility criteria were (a) total cfDNA analysis, (b) mCRC, and (c) prognostic value during palliative treatment. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and meta-analysis applied on both aggregate data extraction and individual patients’ data. Results Ten eligible cohorts were identified, including a total of 1,076 patients. Seven studies used quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods, two BEAMing [beads, emulsification, amplification, and magnetics] technology, and one study digital droplet polymerase chain reaction. The baseline levels of cfDNA was similar in the presented studies, and all studies reported a clear prognostic value in favor of patients with lowest levels of baseline cfDNA. A meta-analysis revealed a combined estimate of favorable overall survival hazard ratio (HR) in patients with levels below the median cfDNA (HR = 2.39, 95% confidence interval 2.03–2.82, p < .0001). Conclusion The total cfDNA levels are high in patients with mCRC and bear strong prognostic information, which should be tested prospectively by using a predefined cut-off value based on normal values in healthy cohorts. Finally, the potential use of cfDNA for detection of tumor-specific mutations was emphasized in a large individual patients’ data meta-analysis.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference26 articles.

1. Colorectal cancer;Cunningham;Lancet,2010

2. The predictive value of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Therkildsen;Acta Oncol,2014

3. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: Quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells;Jahr;Cancer Res,2001

4. Free DNA in the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy;Leon;Cancer Res,1997

5. Prognostic and predictive roles for circulating biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancer;Mattos-Arruda;Future Oncol,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3