Assessment of NETest Clinical Utility in a U.S. Registry-Based Study

Author:

Liu Eric1,Paulson Scott2,Gulati Anthony3,Freudman Jon4,Grosh William5,Kafer Sheldon6,Wickremesinghe Prasanna C.7,Salem Ronald R.8,Bodei Lisa9

Affiliation:

1. Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

2. Texas Oncology – Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

3. Bennett Cancer Center, Stamford, Connecticut, USA

4. Freudman Healthcare Consulting, San Rafael, California, USA

5. Emily Couric Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

6. Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA

7. Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, New York, USA

8. Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

9. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background The clinical relevance of molecular biomarkers in oncology management has been recognized in breast and lung cancers. We evaluated a blood-based multigene assay for management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in a real-world study (U.S. registry NCT02270567). Diagnostic accuracy and relationship to clinical disease status in two cohorts (treated and watch-and-wait) were evaluated. Materials and Methods Patients with NETs (n = 100) were followed for 6–12 months. Patients’ primary tumors were gastroenteropancreatic (68%), lung 20%, and of unknown origin (12%). Characteristics included well-differentiated, low-grade tumors (97%), stage IV disease (96%); treatment with surgery (70%); and drug treatment (56%). NETest was measured at each visit and disease status determined by RECIST. Scores categorized as low (NETest 14%–40%) or high (≥80%) defined disease as stable or progressive. Multivariate analyses determined the strength of the association with progression-free survival (PFS). Results NETest diagnostic accuracy was 96% and concordant (95%) with image-demonstrable disease. Scores were reproducible (97%) and concordant with clinical status (98%). The NETest was the only feature linked to PFS (odds ratio, 6.1; p < .0001). High NETest correlated with progressive disease (81%; median PFS, 6 months), and low NETest correlated with stable disease (87%; median PFS, not reached). In the watch-and-wait cohort, low NETest was concordant with stable disease in 100% of patients, and high NETest was associated with management changes in 83% of patients. In the treated cohort, all low NETest patients (100%) remained stable. A high NETest was linked to intervention and treatment stabilization (100%). Use of NETest was associated with reduced imaging (biannual to annual) in 36%–38% of patients. Conclusion Blood NETest is an accurate diagnostic and can be of use in monitoring disease status and facilitating management change in both watch-and-wait and treatment cohorts.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3