Abstract
This study addresses the collective phenomena as a post-war era and the converting form regional to international power. collective action is working together through a mandating agency solves some of the collective achievement. The convert from peacekeeping role to the international system in continuation. This paper will take North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO as the post -Cold War collective action’s problems as a case study. The study is arguing that the role of international system in continuation for NATO after collapse of USSR as first point NATO as the post-Cold War collective action problems. To test our argument, we use only quantitative data. The study finds out that the only continuation for NATO after collapse of USSR is USA and some European countries as a tool for their own expansions in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.
Publisher
Ontario Teaching Services
Reference22 articles.
1. Aquirre, M. & Fischer, P. (1992), Discriminate Intervention: Defining NATO for the ‘90s, Middle Wast Research and Information Project. Retrived from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3012830
2. Asmus, R. D., Kugler, R. L., & Larrabee, F. (1993). Building a New NATO. Foreign Affairs, 72(4), 28-40. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
3. Burnell, P. (2008). International democracy promotion: a role for public goods theory?. Contemporary Politics, 14(1), 37-52. doi:10.1080/13569770801913249
4. Cohn, W. A. (2010). Targeting Terror. New Presence: The Prague Journal of Central European Affairs, 12(3), 59-72. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
5. Croft, S., Howorth, J., Terriff, T. & Webber, M. (2000), NATO’s Triple Challenge, Blackwell Publishing, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2625951