Double Postbulbar Block in the Prevention of Postmanipulation Pancreatitis

Author:

Frolov P. A.1ORCID,Korotkevich A. G.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. M.A. Podgorbunsky Kuzbass Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care

2. Novokuznetsk State Institute for Advanced Training of Physicians, branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education; A.A. Lutsik Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital No. 29

Abstract

Abstract The problems of preventing postmanipulation pancreatitis (PMP) remain the subject of debate and a lot of research from leading scientific clinics around the world. The article is devoted to the assessment of prevention methods of PMP in patients with lesion of the pancreaticobiliary zone who underwent transpapillary interventions. Aim of the study Evaluation of the effectiveness of the author’s method of preventing PMP.Material and methods A prospective two-center randomized study included 545 patients treated in the Department of Liver Surgery and General Surgery in 2020–2022, who underwent ERCP and endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. There were 146 (26.8%) male patients, and 399 (73.2%) female patients, aged from 18 to 92 years, the mean age 62.7±7.4 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the method of preventing PMP: in the 1st group, standard drug premedication was supplemented with two postbulbar blocks with a solution of lidocaine 0.5% 10 ml before and after the intervention (RF Patent No. 2779221, 09/05/2022), in the 2nd group standard premedication was combined with placebo was used, and in the comparison group 3 no submucosal injections were performed. The monitoring of clinical manifestations of PMP and the level of amylase was carried out every 12 hours until the parameters normalized. Statistical processing was carried out using program STATISTICA 6.1 for Windows.Results The frequency of mild pancreatitis, corresponding to the criteria for PMP, did not exceed 18% in groups 1 and 3 (p=0.3408), but was lower with pseudo postbulbar block, 9% (χ2=2.83, р=0.0926), the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of severe pancreatitis was significantly lower in group 1 with double postbulbar block where there were no cases of pancreatic necrosis among 143 patients (χ2=6.19, р=0.0129). The mortality did not differ significantly among groups (χ2=0.15, р=0.7004). The duration of the hospital period had significant differences between groups (Student’s t-test 1.973, p=0.001). The hospital period with double postbulbar block turned out to be significantly shorter.Conclusion 1. Double postbulbar blockade significantly reduces the risk of developing severe postmanipulation pancreatitis, regardless of existing risk factors. 2. Double postbulbar block significantly reduces the duration of the hospital period after endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. 3. Pseudo postbulbar block using saline requires further evaluation as a possible way to prevent mild pancreatitis.

Publisher

The Scientific and Practical Society of Emergency Medicine Physicians

Reference17 articles.

1. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post­ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):143–149.e9. PMID: 25088919 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.045

2. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Buxbaum JL, Freeman M, Amateau SK, Chalhoub JM, Chowdhury A, et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on post­ERCP pancreatitis prevention strategies: methodology and review of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;97(2):163–183.e40. PMID: 36517309 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.011

3. Katsinelos P, Gkagkalis S, Chatzimavroudis G, Beltsis A, Terzoudis S, Zavos C, et al. Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: a retrospective analysis of 274 cases. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(12):3286–3292. PMID: 22714730 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620­012­2271­8

4. Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)­related adverse events: post­ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015;25(1):107–121. PMID: 25442962 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2014.09.006

5. Johnson KD, Perisetti A, Tharian B, Thandassery R, Jamidar P, Goyal H, et al. Endoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyRelated Complications and Their Management Strategies: A “Scoping” Literature Review. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65(2):361–375. PMID: 31792671 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620­019­05970­3

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3