Affiliation:
1. Burn center, I.I. Dzhanelidze St. Petersburg Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
2. Burn center, I.I. Dzhanelidze St. Petersburg Research Institute of Emergency Medicine; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
3. Consultative and Diagnostic Center ”Clinician Plus”
Abstract
Relevance. An important component of the diagnostic process in combustiology is the collection of anamnesis. At the same time, verification of the very fact of a burn injury of the skin, as a rule, does not seem to be a difficult task even for a novice doctor. However, specialists from the I.I. Dzhanelidze Institute regularly encounter errors in the differential diagnosis of burn injuries at the prehospital stage on the part of both ambulance teams (EMS) and surgeons (traumatologists) of non-specialized medical institutions. Each such case attracts attention and takes up a significant part of the time resource of the entire staff of the inpatient department of the emergency medical service for the process of clarifying and verifying the correct diagnosis, as well as determining the further routing of such a patient.Aim of study. To study the structure of diagnostic errors at the prehospital stage of the EMS to optimize patient routing by improving the existing organizational and methodological standards.Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of the case histories of all victims who were admitted to the inpatient department of the Emergency Medical Department of the I.I. Dzhanelidze St. Petersburg Research Institute of Emergency Medicine during the period from January 2018 to December 2019.Results. 4,951 patients were admitted with a leading diagnosis of the referring institution, suggesting a history of burn injury. The incidence of diagnostic errors at the prehospital stage of emergency care was 410 cases (8.3%), while burn injury was completely excluded in 178 cases (3.6%).Conclusions. 1. The results of the analysis revealed a high incidence of diagnostic errors at the prehospital stage of emergency care (8.3%), the main reason for which is the lack of awareness of differential diagnostics within the narrow specialty (combustiology) of primary contact physicians. 2. Shown is the introduction of training practice for doctors and paramedics of emergency medical services, surgeons and traumatologists of primary care in combustiology cycles in specialized burn departments. 3.In order to ensure continuity in the process of providing medical care to patients with burns, it is necessary to create a unified database of convalescents to form a feedback channel with the outpatient clinic during the implementation of the rehabilitation complex.
Publisher
The Scientific and Practical Society of Emergency Medicine Physicians
Reference15 articles.
1. Bagnenko SF, Khubutiya MSh, Miroshnichenko AG, Minnullin IP (eds.). Skoraya meditsinskaya pomoshch’. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ.; 2015. (In Russ.)
2. Shamolin MV. Problems of Differential and Topological Diagnostics. Part II. Problem of Differential Diagnostics. Vestnik of Samara University. Natural Science Series. 2019;25(3):22–32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18287/2541-7525-2019-25-3-22-32
3. Ashton R, Leppard B, Cooper H. Differential Diagnosis in Dermatology. 4th ed. CRC Press; 2014. (Russ. ed.: Eshton R., Leppard B., Kuper Kh. Differentsial’naya diagnostika v dermatologii. Atlas. Moscow; 2018.)
4. Kuklin IA, Kokhan MM, Safonova GD, Topychkanova EP, Korobkov IV. Sposob differentsial’noy diagnostiki gribovidnogo mikoza ot khronicheskikh dermatozov. Patent RUS 2687274 C1. No 2018124678 decl. 05.07.2018, publ. 13.05.2019 (In Russ.) Available at: https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2687274C1_20190513 [Accessed 03 Nov 2020]
5. So J, Hamstra A, Сalame A, Hamann C, Jacob Sh. Great Imitator: Allergic Contact Dermatitis Differential Diagnosis, Clues to Diagnosis, Histopathology, and Treatment. In: Current Treatment Options in Allergy. 2015;2(4):333–348.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献