SCORING/ INTERPRETATION OF THEMATIC APPERCEPTIVE TECHNIQUES (TATS): A REVIEW

Author:

Lamba Umesh1,Lone Dr. Zahoor A.1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Education and Humanities, Lovely Professional University

Abstract

This paper highlights the importance of Thematic Apperceptive Techniques (TATs) in personality assessment and emphasizes that these techniques facilitate articulation, predict behavior in real life settings, contribute to incremental validity, less prone to faking or deliberate deception, and useful in intervention. Also, some issues affecting scientific credentials of these techniques are highlighted, viz., unsystematic use, false assumptions in critical literature, false information in general psychology textbooks, and some general issues which are hindrance in development of these techniques. Need for supportive research is highlighted, and as a step in this direction, this paper presents various scoring/interpretive approaches to TATs, retrieved using two large bibliographic databases, viz., SCOPUS and Google Scholar (GS). This paper is useful for researchers and clinicians who can gain by having knowledge of approaches to TATs evaluation. No such review exists which consolidates TATs in terms of scoring/ interpretation since its introduction, i.e., 1935. Finally, some suggestions for future research are also given.

Publisher

Gujarat University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Annotti, Lee A., and Hedwig Teglasi. “Functioning in the Real World: Using Storytelling to Improve Validity in the Assessment of Executive Functions.” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 99, no. 3, Aug. 2016, pp. 254– 64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1205075.

2. Aaron, Betty. A Manual for Analysis of the Thematic Apperception Test, a Method and Technique for Personality Research. Wills E. Berg, 1949.

3. Bellak, Leopold, and David Abrams. The TAT, CAT, and SAT in Clinical Use. 6th ed., Pearson Education Limited, 1996.

4. Benziman, H., and M. Perlow. “Self Psychology Interpretation of the Thematic Apperception Test.” Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, vol. 63, no. 1, 1999, pp. 103–10.

5. Bornstein, Robert F., et al. “Face Validity and Fakability of Objective and Projective Measures of Dependency.” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 63, no. 2, Oct. 1994, pp. 363–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6302_14.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3