Affiliation:
1. Department of Education, Cotton University, Assam
2. Department of Education, Cotton University, Assam, India
Abstract
Present study focuses on finding out the relationship between study habits a student develops during undergraduate level and role of his/her birth ordinal position in choosing a particular type of study habit. To fulfill this objective Study Habit Inventory Scale (SHI-PS) developed by M. N. Palsane and Anuradha Sharma was applied on a sample group of 100 students belonging to different birth ordinal positions. Students learn as per own individuality. Some like to study during day time, some night time, some while listening music while some in pin dropped silence. Study habit is an action such as reading, taking notes, holding study groups which the students perform regularly and habitually in order to accomplish the task of learning. It is same as other forms of habit we develop to fulfill certain needs such as waking up early for office or school, walking for fitness. As development of other forms of habits depends on gender, family circumstances and facilities received at home there is a possibility that birth ordinal positions, type of family can act as a factor in determining type of study habit adopted. In this paper this probable relation has been questioned and efforts were made to bring forth the truth.
Reference8 articles.
1. 1. Agba, R. Why Students must Develop Study Habits. Calabar: Rixmas Publishing Company, 2013.
2. 2. Aquino. Study Habits and Attitudes of Freshmen Students: Implications for Academic Intervention Programs. University Research Pool Press, Philippines, 2011.
3. 3. Ashish, R. Study Habits for Students: Bad Ones to Avoid. Good Ones to Achieve Success Publications, 2013.
4. 4. Ebele Uju, F. and Olofu, Paul. “Study habit and its impact on secondary school students.” Educational Research and Reviews. vol. 12, no.10, 2017, pp. 583-588.
5. 5. Harris, Kimberly A. and Morrow, K. Brent. “Differential Effects of Birth Order and Gender on Perceptions of Responsibility and Dominance.” Individual Psychology: Journal of Adlerian Theory: Research & Practice. vol. 48, no. 1, 1992, pp. 109-118.