DOES COMPUTER ASSISTED INSTRUCTION (CAI) WORK BETTER THAN TRADITIONAL TEACHING IN IMPROVING LEARNING BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS AMONG TENTH-GRADE STUDENTS?

Author:

Kaur Avinash1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Education, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra

Abstract

The present study intended to compare Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) and traditional method of teaching biological concepts to tenth class students in terms of their achievement. Microsoft PowerPoint software was utilized in CAI method to instruct students whereas the traditional method consisted of chalk & talk method with non-electronic teaching aids. The experiment was conducted on 50 students of a tenth class, divided into control and experimental group with a strength of 25 each. To compare the achievement of students Criterion-Referenced Tests (CRTs) were prepared and used before and after the instructional period. The findings revealed that there is a significant difference in means of pre-test scores and post-test scores of both groups, and when comparing post-tests of the control and experimental group, CAI has been favoured significantly in terms of achievement. Moreover, students of the CAI group overwhelmingly appreciated CAI method of teaching.

Publisher

Gujarat University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Akçay, Hüsamettin, et al. “Effects of Computer Based Learning on Students’ Attitudes and Achievements Towards Analytical Chemistry.” Educational Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, 2006, pp. 44-48. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102437.pdf

2. Ameyaw, Yaw, and Agbotse, Y. “Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) as an Alternative Instructional Tool for Improving the Teaching and Learning of Blood Circulation in Humans.” International Journal of Advanced Biological Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 2016, pp. 210-218. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340621842_COMPUTER-ASSISTED_INSTRUCTION_CAI_AS_AN_ALTERNATIVE_INSTRUCTIONAL_TOOL_FOR_IMPROVING_THE_TEACHING_AND_LEARNING_OF_BLOOD_CIRCULATION_IN_HUMANS/citation/download

3. Morrell, Patricia. “The Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction on Student Achievement in High School Biology.” Computer Assisted Instruction, vol. 92, no. 4, 1992, pp. 177-181.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1992.tb12168.x

4. Nkemdilim, E, and Okeke, Sam. “Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Ecological Concepts.” International Journal of Progressive Education, vol. 10, no. 2, 2014, pp. 6-13. https://ijpe.inased.org/makale_indir/2435

5. Phillips, T, and Moss G D. “Can CAL Biology Packages be Used to Replace the Teacher.” Journal of Biological Education, vol. 27, no. 3, 1993, pp. 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1993.9655336

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3