A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN INDIA

Author:

Khan Saif Rasul1,Bora Jyoti Prasad2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Law, Gauhati University Intermed Clinic, FA Road, Machkhowa

2. University Law College, Gauhati University

Abstract

Reproduction is a key element in the continuation of human civilisation. The central unit in a society is family and thereby procreation plays a critical role towards that end. Reproduction in the traditional sense involves physical intercourse between a male and female resulting in the creation of a baby. However, in the past few years, other alternative forms of reproduction have developed. Many factors, particularly infertility and the formation of new family structures have increased the demand for such technologies. Such technologies involve intervention by a third party, a medical expert to facilitate reproduction outside of the traditional method. Such technologies have their benefits, but at the same time, have bioethical issues, including questions of morality, conflict with religious beliefs and violation of human rights. A delicate balance needs to be maintained in this context wherein law and morality, social structures and beliefs play a prominent role. The article intents to draw focus on assisted reproductive technology in context of India and some foreign jurisdictions. The main aim is to provide a critical analysis and review of the normative standards in India.

Publisher

Gujarat University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Anan Tapiromkul. “Legal Problems On Commercial Surrogacy In Thailand Under The Protection Of Children Born From Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act, B.E. 2558.” Thammasat Business Law Journal, vol. 5, 2015, so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TBLJ/article/view/111712.

2. Bagri/Anand, N. T. (2021, June 30). A Controversial Ban on Commercial Surrogacy Could Leave Women in India With Even Fewer Choices. Time. https://time.com/6075971/commercial-surrogacy-ban-india/.

3. Bhatia, G. (2019). Case Comment: Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India: The Indian Supreme Court’s Decriminalization of Same-Sex Relations. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 22(1), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413_022001010

4. Brahams, Diana. “The Hasty British Ban on Commercial Surrogacy on JSTOR.” The Hastings Centre Report, Feb. 1987, doi.org/10.2307/3562435.

5. Bumiller, Elisabeth. “Mothers for Others.” Washington Post, The Washington Post, 9 Mar. 1983, www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1983/03/09/mothers-for-others/e6944450-f0ff-4174-a5c4-9e5ce916fbb4/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3