Five decades of risk perception measurements of tobacco use: a review of literature

Abstract

Perceptions of risk are beliefs about the likelihood of damage orloss. People make subjective judgments regarding the intensityand features of a danger. Smoking start and continuation areinfluenced by risk perception. Risk perception of tobacco useor smoking has always been controversial. Few studies foundthat risk perception is overestimated by smokers and tobaccousers, while other studies found that smokers underestimatethe risk of smoking. It has been observed that different authorshave been using different approaches to measure the risk perceptionof tobacco use. The present literature review is an ontologicalexploration of the process of calculating this constructand determining which method gives more holistic and robustinformation. A literature survey was carried out to understanddifferent ways in which risk perception can be measured. Fifty-seven studies were identified from 1970 to 2020 in which riskperception was calculated for any form of tobacco use. Theliterature review found that the researchers used two practicalapproaches to measure risk perception. In the first approach,the researchers tried to measure only the health risks of tobaccouse, and in the second, multiple dimensions of tobaccouse were measured. Most commonly perceived addictionand then the social risk of tobacco use was accessed. Thoughrecent literature is dominated by an approach where a singledimension, i.e., perceived health risk of tobacco use, is mostcommonly access, it is inferring from the available literature thattools that access multiple sizes of the perceived risk of tobaccouse give more comprehensive and robust information aboutthat construct which can be used further to create tobacco useprevention intervention.