The expression of futurity in Spanish and Portuguese: similarities and differences

Author:

Cunha Luís Filipe

Abstract

Abstract. The primary goal of this paper is to establish a comparison between the two most important forms that express futurity in Spanish and in European Portuguese, viz. the Futuro Simple / Futuro Simples (Simple Future) and the structure ir (‘go’) a / ir (‘go’) + Infinitive. Whereas the Simple Future behaves quite similarly in both languages, conveying temporal information of posteriority that may be strongly constrained by modal and aspectual factors, the periphrastic construction differs considerably in Spanish and in European Portuguese. In effect, contrary to its Spanish counterpart, which is considered, in the literature, ambiguous between an aspectual (prospective) and a temporal (future) operator, the data from European Portuguese point towards a consistent temporal meaning for the structure ir (‘go’) + Infinitive. So, we investigate the conditions under which these forms are licenced, in order to describe their semantic similarities and differences; moreover, since they both mainly bear temporal information, we compare the behaviour of the European Portuguese Simple Future and the structure ir (‘go’) + Infinitive, proposing that the former is less restricted than the latter: besides the location of a given situation in a future interval, ir (‘go’) + Infinitive seems to require an additional temporal boundary preventing the relevant eventuality to overlap the speech time.

Publisher

UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Subject

Geology,Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology

Reference76 articles.

1. Alarcos Llorach, Emilio (1994). Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Real Academia Española / Espasa Calpe.

2. Barbosa, Juliana Bertucci (2007). “A expressão do futuro no Português Brasileiro contemporâneo”. Revista Eletrônica do Instituto de Humanidades VI (XXIII), pp. 42-50. http://publicacoes.unigranrio.edu.br/index.php/reihm/article/viewFile/60/64

3. Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Alessandro Lenci (2012). “Pluractionality, habituality and gnomic imperfectivity”. In Robert Binnick (ed.), Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 852-880. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381979.013.0030

4. Binnick, Robert (1991). Time and the verb. A guide to tense and aspect. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.

5. Bravo Martín, Ana (2008). La perífrasis "ir a + infinitivo" en el sistema temporal y aspectual del Español. PhD thesis, Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/8074/

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3