Continuous Glucose Monitoring Effects on Maternal Glycemic Control and Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study

Author:

Yu Fan1,Lv Lijuan1,Liang Zhijiang1,Wang Yi1,Wen Jiying1,Lin Xiaohong1,Zhou Yuheng1,Mai Caiyuan1,Niu Jianmin1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (F.Y., L.L., Y.W., J.Wen, X.L., Y.Z., C.M., J.N.) and Healthcare Department (Z.L.), GuangDong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, China 510010

Abstract

Context: Clinical evidence on the consequential effects of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is scarcely available. Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of CGM on maternal glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with GDM . Patients: In total, 340 Chinese pregnant women with GDM were allocated to either the routine care group (n = 190) or the CGM group (n =150). Design and Setting: This was a prospective cohort study in the Department of Obstetrics of GuangDong Women and Children Hospital in China. Recruitment started in April 2011 and stopped in August 2012. Interventions: A 72-hour CGM system was used as a supplementary tool for glucose monitoring in the CGM group. Primary Outcome Measurements: The parameters of glycemic variability included mean blood glucose, the SD of blood glucose, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGEs), and the mean of daily differences. The maternal outcomes (preeclampsia and cesarean delivery) and composite neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Results: The SD of blood glucose, MAGEs, and mean of daily differences values were significantly lower in the CGM group compared with those of the routine care group (P < .001). Subjects in the CGM group were at lower risk of preeclampsia and primary cesarean delivery compared with the routine care group (P < .05). The mean infant birth weight of women in the CGM group was lower than infants of women in the routine care group (P < .001). The MAGE was associated with birth weight (β = 0.196, P < .001), and it was an independent factor for preeclampsia (odds ratio, 3.66; 95% confidence interval 2.16–6.20) and composite neonatal outcome (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.77). Conclusions: The use of supplementary CGM combined with routine antenatal care can improve the glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes of patients with GDM.

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference31 articles.

1. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2011;American Diabetes Association;Diabetes Care,2011

2. Gestational diabetes mellitus: is it a clinical entity?;Hod;Diabetes Rev,1995

3. Neonatal morbidities in gestation diabetes mellitus;Persson;Diabetes Care,1998

4. Gestational diabetes in Victoria in 1996: Incidence, risk factors and outcomes;Stone;Med J Aust,2002

5. Gestational diabetes mellitus;Kjos;N Engl J Med,1999

Cited by 92 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3