Efficacy of Dosimetric Versus Empiric Prescribed Activity of 131I for Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Author:

Klubo-Gwiezdzinska Joanna12,Van Nostrand Douglas3,Atkins Frank3,Burman Kenneth1,Jonklaas Jacqueline4,Mete Mihriye5,Wartofsky Leonard6

Affiliation:

1. Endocrinology (J.K.-G., K.B.), Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C. 20010-2910

2. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology (J.K.-G.), Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland

3. Divisions of Nuclear Medicine (D.V.N., F.A.), Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C. 20010-2910

4. Division of Endocrinology and Medicine (J.J.), Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Medicine, Pasquerilla Healthcare Center, Washington, D.C. 20007

5. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department (M.M.), MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782

6. Department of Medicine (L.W.), Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C. 20010-2910

Abstract

Abstract Background: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine (131I) therapy. The prescribed activity of 131I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of 131I (E-Rx); and 2) dosimetry-based prescribed activity of 131I (D-Rx). Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the relative treatment efficacy and side effects of D-Rx vs. E-Rx. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with distant metastases and/or locoregionally advanced radioiodine-avid DTC who were treated with either D-Rx or E-Rx. Response to treatment was based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria. Results: The study group consisted of 87 patients followed for 51 ± 35 months, of whom 43 were treated with D-Rx and 44 with E-Rx. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, and status of metastases revealed that the D-Rx group tended to be 70% less likely to progress (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.087–1.02; P = 0.052) and more likely to obtain complete response (CR) compared to the E-Rx group (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–53.5; P = 0.029). There was an association in the D-Rx group between the observed CR and percentage of maximum tolerable activity given as a first treatment of 131I (P = 0.030). The advantage of D-Rx was specifically apparent in the locoregionally advanced group because CR was significantly higher in D-Rx vs. E-Rx in this group of patients (35.7 vs. 3.3%; P = 0.009). The rates of partial response, stable disease, and progression-free survival, as well as the frequency of side effects, were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Higher efficacy of D-Rx with a similar safety profile compared to E-Rx supports the rationale for employing individually prescribed activity in high-risk patients with DTC.

Funder

NIH

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3