Lipid-Lowering Agents in Older Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Author:

Ponce Oscar J123,Larrea-Mantilla Laura13,Hemmingsen Bianca4,Serrano Valentina35,Rodriguez-Gutierrez Rene36,Spencer-Bonilla Gabriela37,Alvarez-Villalobos Neri36,Benkhadra Khaled8,Haddad Abdullah9,Gionfriddo Michael R10,Prokop Larry J1,Brito Juan P3,Murad Mohammad Hassan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

2. Unidad de Conocimiento y Evidencia (CONEVID), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru

3. Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

5. Department of Nutrition, Diabetes and Metabolism, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

6. Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Hospital Universitario “Dr. José E. Gonzalez,” Plataforma INVEST-KER Mexico, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México

7. University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico

8. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan

9. Department of Medicine, Saint Clair Memorial Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

10. Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania

Abstract

Abstract Background The efficacy of lipid-lowering agents on patient-important outcomes in older individuals is unclear. Methods We included randomized trials that enrolled individuals aged 65 years or older and that included at least 1 year of follow-up. Pairs of reviewers selected and appraised the trials. Results We included 23 trials that enrolled 60,194 elderly patients. For primary prevention, statins reduced the risk of coronary artery disease [CAD; relative risk (RR): 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.91] and myocardial infarction (MI; RR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.66) but not all-cause or cardiovascular mortality or stroke. These effects were imprecise in patients with diabetes, but there was no significant interaction between diabetes status and the intervention effect. For secondary prevention, statins reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.89), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.79), CAD (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.77), MI (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.79), and revascularization (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.77). Intensive (vs less-intensive) statin therapy reduced the risk of CAD and heart failure. Niacin did not reduce the risk of revascularization, and fibrates did not reduce the risk of stroke, cardiovascular mortality, or CAD. Conclusion High-certainty evidence supports statin use for secondary prevention in older individuals. Evidence for primary prevention is less certain. Data in older individuals with diabetes are limited; however, no empirical evidence has shown a significant difference based on diabetes status.

Funder

Endocrine Society

Publisher

The Endocrine Society

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry,Endocrinology,Biochemistry,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference54 articles.

1. Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in the elderly (with emphasis on patients > or =75 years of age): an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention;Williams,2002

2. Aggressive lipid management in very elderly adults: less is more;Rich;J Am Geriatr Soc,2014

3. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines;Stone;Circulation,2014

4. Appropriateness of statin prescription in the elderly;Ruscica;Eur J Intern Med,2018

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3